Built fast in Cursor. Now nobody can safely change it.
Cursor makes writing code fast — sometimes faster than anyone can keep coherent. Accept enough suggestions without a guiding hand and you get a codebase that works but has no consistent shape, no tests, and the occasional hallucinated API. We bring it back to something a team can maintain.
What we usually find with Cursor.
No consistent pattern
Every feature was written a slightly different way, so nothing is predictable and onboarding anyone is painful.
Hallucinated or misused APIs
Code that references things that don't quite exist, or uses libraries in ways that break under real conditions.
Zero test coverage
Nothing tells you what you broke, so every change is a gamble and shipping feels dangerous.
Works, but nobody understands why
The AI wrote it, it mostly runs, and there's no human who can reason about the whole thing.
From prototype to production.
Fixed scope, honest verdicts, and you keep every line of code. We'll tell you if it's a quick fix or a bigger job before you commit a euro.
- 01
Establish a coherent structure
We impose consistent patterns and boundaries so the codebase becomes predictable and navigable.
- 02
Add tests where they matter
Coverage around the critical paths so change stops being a gamble and regressions get caught early.
- 03
Fix the correctness gaps
Track down the misused APIs and fragile assumptions, and replace them with code that holds up.
A product you can actually launch.
- A structural and correctness audit
- Consistent patterns across the codebase
- Tests around the critical paths
- The fragile and misused code, fixed
- Documentation your team can follow
From first call to shipped.
Free 15-minute triage call
Same week · freeTell us what's broken. We ask the sharp questions, give an honest first read on whether it's a rescue, a refactor or a rebuild, and agree on next steps. No sales theatre.
- Honest first assessment
- Rescue / refactor / rebuild verdict
- Clear next step
You leave knowing where you stand — even if you never hire us.
Rescue Assessment
About 5 business daysWe get read access and go deep: architecture, security, technical-debt map, test gaps, CI/CD and deployment. You get a scored report with a prioritized fix roadmap and a go/no-go verdict.
- Scored codebase report
- Prioritized remediation roadmap
- Fixed quote for the fix
- Go / no-go recommendation
A clear, evidence-based plan — and a fixed price for the work.
Stabilization Sprint
2–4 weeks · fixed scopeWe stabilize the highest-risk parts first: stop the bleeding, fix what's broken, harden security, and get you to a state you can ship and build on. Fixed scope, daily visibility.
- The critical fixes, shipped
- Security & deployment hardening
- Documentation of what we changed
- Daily progress you can see
A working, deployable product you understand and control.
Delivery & retainer
Ongoing · month to monthFinish the roadmap and, when you're ready, keep a senior team on tap to build the next things — features, mobile, scale. Month to month, cancel anytime. You keep all code and access, always.
- Roadmap delivered
- Optional ongoing engineering team
- You own all code and infrastructure
From rescued to shipping — with a team that already knows your code.
Live products that prove it.
Straight answers.
Not at all — used with senior judgement, Cursor is excellent. Problems come from volume without direction: lots of accepted suggestions and no coherent architecture. That's a cleanup job, not a condemnation of the tool.
No. We keep what's sound and reshape what isn't, in place, so the product keeps working while it gets better. A full rewrite is rare.
Yes — we're happy working the way your team works, and we'll leave behind the structure and tests that make future AI-assisted work safe rather than risky.
Tell us what's broken. We'll tell you the truth.
Start with a free 15-minute call or a written quote. If it's salvageable, we'll show you exactly how — and what it takes.
- You keep all code & access — always
- NDA on request, before you share anything
- Free, no-obligation first read